let us save our earth & sky -- update
شاهد الفلم:
What
in the world are they spraying (Chemtrails(
http://www.weareindanger.com/player1/thevideos2.html?currVideo=0&currCateg=87
...ماذا
يرشون علينا يومياً عبر العالم؟؟؟
...خطير..
مشروع الكيمتريل!!
2011 May26 from
G. Edward
Griffin
www.realityzone.com
Important update!
INVESTIGATORS WANTED
Can
Chemtrails be proved?
This is an updated version of the notice I sent to you yesterday. I awoke
this morning with the realization that I had omitted several important aspects
of the project. They involve the need for photographic documentation and a
uniform template for recording observations of aircraft. I also fine-tuned the
rest of the text, so please bear with me and go through the whole thing again.
This could be one of the best opportunities we ever have had to expose the Evil
Empire.
*******
It seems that the die-hard skeptics refuse to believe what they see with their
own eyes. No matter how many laboratory tests we collect, they always manage to
come up with a theory that, no matter how far fetched it is, would explain the
high levels of aluminum, barium, and strontium in our snow and rain water as
merely due to some climate condition or error in preparing the chemical sample
or some unintended human interaction.
SKI-SLOPE THEORY
When we released our documentary, What in the World Are They Spraying, we
included snow samples taken from Mt. Shasta in Northern California, which
contained toxic levels of these metals. Since snow is merely frozen rain water,
it was clear that this came from the sky and not from the soil or water run-off
from a toxic waste dump. Nevertheless, an Internet debunker challenged our
conclusion by saying that people ski on Mt. Shasta, and skis are made of
aluminum. Therefore, the tested aluminum probably came from the skis! Nothing to
worry about after all.
Of course, this was all made-up nonsense. People do ski on Mt. Shasta, but it is
a big mountain, and there has never been any skiing in the area where the
samples were taken. Even if there had been, that would not explain the high
levels of barium and strontium. These metals are not used in the construction of
skis. Our debunker never bothered to check on any of that. He was merely looking
for some plausible explanation in order to plant doubts into the minds of casual
readers. If people are confused by seemingly plausible explanations that even
remotely could explain the high levels of aluminum, barium, and strontium in
snow and rain water, they will back away from coming to a conclusion and refrain
from challenging the prevailing view.
DUST-BOWL THEORY
Another debunker contacted me a few days ago and claimed that a plausible
explanation for the chemicals in snow on Mt. Shasta is that the samples were
taken in a year with early snow melt which, according to him, means there was a
lot of bare earth exposed at the time, and the wind must have blown dust from
the earth onto the snow. Furthermore, he claims that the soil on Mt. Shasta
contains the same metals as found in the samples; so, you see? Here is another
perfectly plausible explanation. Once again, nothing to worry about.
We are planning to respond to this gentleman as soon as we can find the time to
carefully examine his claims about the early snow melt, the amount of bare earth
exposed, the composition of the surface soil, and especially the rainfall and
moisture levels of the soil during this period. I expect to find that, even if
there had been an early snow melt, the soil on Mt. Shasta would have been far
too moist and covered with moss, ferns, or other ground cover to make the
"dust-bowl" theory even remotely plausible. But it will take a little time to
pull the facts together.
Meanwhile, we must not just play defensive and spend our lives answering the
debunkers. We must take the initiative and obtain new data and information that
will be impossible to dispute. The on-going collection of new snow and rain
samples around the world is part of that strategy. After we have literally
hundreds of such chemical tests, our critics will become hard pressed for new
theories.
PLANE FINDER
One of the most promising technologies to generate hard evidence of chemtrails
is the Internet tracking of planes in flight. There are several computer
programs and devices that track commercial flights in real time and show, not
only their location, but also their flight number, type of aircraft, origin,
destination, speed, and altitude. The cost for this application on an iPhone is
$2.99, and on a computer, it is free. This is amazing technology, and the
programs are fun to use. They work by receiving what is called ADS-B plane
feeds, which are radio signals transmitted by commercial and large private
aircraft. Small planes, military aircraft, and those on classified missions do
not transmit this signal.
I'm sure you already see where this is going. It is theoretically possible to
identify every commercial plane you see overhead either by pointing your iPhone
camera at it or locating it on the screen of your computer. If the debunkers are
correct, we will find that planes spewing trails from horizon-to-horizon all
will be identified as commercial craft, and what we see are merely normal
contrails after all. On the other hand, if we find that commercial craft do
not leave streaks from horizon to horizon but the ones that do are
missing from the system ... well, even the most die-hard skeptic would have to
take a serious look at that.
To be sure, the debunkers will always be able to find some semi-plausible
explanation for everything, even this. For example, not all parts of the world
or even of the United States are serviced by this technology at the present
time, although the most populated areas are. So the debunkers will likely claim
that the coverage is not complete and, therefore, not reliable. Also, there is
some question about whether all commercial planes are equipped with these
transmitters or merely most of them, so the debunkers will claim that a flight
that does not show up in the system is probably just one of those commercial
planes without transmitters. One blogger who is unhappy with the Plane Finder
claims that his iPhone does not work if the plane is closer than 50 miles,
supposedly because of interference by Homeland Security to protect planes from
terrorists. (I do not have an iPhone so I cannot verify his claim, but I had no
trouble tracking aircraft directly overhead when using the full computer version
of Plane Tracker.) In any event, debunkers will claim that the system is filled
with quirks and errors and is not reliable. You get the picture.
In spite of these arguments, I think there is an opportunity here to collect
data that will be compelling, even if there are areas not serviced by the
technology and even if a small percentage of commercial planes are, in fact,
without transmitters. If we can demonstrate that flights with horizon-to-horizon
trails are missing from the system, we will have put one more nail into the
coffin of chemtrail denial.
TWO-EDGED SWORD
This project is a two-edged sword. What if we find that all those trails really
are coming from scheduled planes carrying passengers or freight? That would mean
we have been on the wrong track, and we would have to re-examine our evidence
and re-consider our position. There are some who believe that spraying is done
by planes performing routine commercial services, but I have not considered that
to be likely in view of the huge amount of chemicals needed for such missions
and the difficulty in concealing the mixing of chemicals with jet fuel, to say
nothing of the effect it would have on fuel performance and damage to the
engines. Furthermore, Planes that fly in the crazy patterns we have seen would
hardly go unnoticed and unreported by passengers. In any event, the results of a
field test such as I am proposing will clear up many of these questions.
Here is what I am asking you to do. If this project interests you, please go on
the Internet and become familiar with a program called Plane Finder:
http://planefinder.net. Play with it a while to see how you can track
aircraft anywhere in the world, provided there are receiving stations in that
area. When you see on your screen that a plane is moving over your location, you
can go outdoors and watch it in the sky. Vice versa, when you see an
aircraft overhead, you should be able to go to your computer and watch it moving
across a map on your screen if it is in the system. Every time you
see a plane, get its identity from Plane Finder and note if it has long trails
(lingering over more than half the sky and feathering out into a lingering milky
haze), short trails (moving along with the aircraft and dissipating as they go),
or no trails (usually low altitude flights). Record all the data about the
flight, including the time. Be aware that the time is given in what they call
Coordinated Universal Time (UTC). This is the same time everywhere in the world,
so it probably will not be the same as your local time. To convert to local
time, you will need a conversion chart, found at
http://www.maar.us/utc_time_converter.html. A simpler way to obtain the
local time is to read the hours from your watch or clock and record the minutes
from the program readout.
PHOTO AND VIDEO DOCUMENTATION
Although not essential, it would be a great help to photographically document
each plane that is recorded, especially any that don't show up in the system.
The simplest method is to take a still photo and make sure the photo ID number
is recorded along with the flight data. That will make it harder for the
debunkers to claim that there is no way to substantiate that our subjective
interpretation of a contrail vs. a chemtrail means anything. Let the
photos speak for themselves. If you are a video buff, it would be a nice
additional touch to have a second party take videos of the whole verification
process, everything from seeing the plane in the sky to photographing it and
getting its identification (or finding that it has no identification). If we
produce a follow up to What in the World Are They Spraying, this might
make an interesting segment. But don't let the added requirement of photographs
and video get in the way of doing the basic observations. That is what really
matters in the long run.
DATA RECORD TEMPLATE
To generate a statistical summary, we will need all data in a uniform format, so
we have created a data-record template that you can download here:
http://lib.store.yahoo.net/lib/realityzone/planefindertemplate.pdf. Please
use this to enter your observations. When complete, the sheets can be scanned
and emailed to me as a digital file to the email address shown below or faxed to
1-805-497-0685 or mailed to P.O. Box 4646, Westlake Village, CA 91359.
That's it. If 50 or 100 people will do this, and if they are able to collect
data on flights over a one-month period, we will have a record of immense value.
Please send it to me at
gedward.griffin@verizon.net.
Are we going to have fun or what?
Ed Griffin
please..... if u can send
us the App for windows mobile and iPhone to share it... yes we will have fun :p
أضيفت في:26-5-2011... فضيحة و نصيحة> الصحة والتلوث والبيئة .... إذا وجدت أن الموضوع مفيد لك، أرجو منك دعم الموقع
|